Tuesday, September 27, 2005

Why Are The Liberals And Pals Voting Against Raising The Age Of Consent From age 14?

Well, as you can see from this pic, that position is very popular with some of their strongest supporters...



Update: I guess Sean over at SDA agrees :

"I don't care what the law says, any greasy older male caught laying a hand on my daughter before she reaches the age of majority will suddenly find himself feeling a draft where his diaphram used to be. And if I happen to bag a Liberal, so much the better."

I only have one question Sean - why would a greasy older male be wearing a diaphram?

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I Guess NAMBLA is "behind" them all the way?

JP

12:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why make criminals out of two 17 year olds fooling around. You have not thought this through.

11:08 PM  
Blogger "Expert" Tom said...

Anona-Mouse, I think you are the one who hasn't thought this one out. Two 17 year olds would have nothing to worry about, even a 14 yr old and a 17 yr old wouldn't because the idea is age of consent will be 16 with a floating age bracket of 3-4 years. The point of this legislation is to prevent a 50 year old to prey upon 14-15 year old kids. I just cannot understand the thought process of anyone who is apposed to this bill.

9:54 AM  
Blogger Prince Remus said...

ET, since when is lust connected to the "thought process"?

Btw, could it be that the degree of sexual self-confidence in a mature person who habitually prefers immaturity in a partner, likely reflects in an inverse ratio more on their sexual ability than(?)- - - oh, never mind.

11:34 AM  
Blogger Candace said...

Get real, anonymous2. Cops won't charge stat rape when a 12-yr-old is involved and it was "consensual" because by the time it gets to court, she/he is 14 and "of age" - case dismissed.

So the REAL age of consent is 12. Ick.

2:13 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home